This theory suggest that people with certain traits are more likely to adopt behaviours that are associated with strong leadership. This theory can help us distinguish strong and weak leadership depending on a persons traits. If this theory is adopted by a football coach for example, then he will be able to select a player with certain characteristics that will make a strong leader.
Universal Behaviour Theories of Leadership
This theory relates leadership to behaviour, the theory is helpful in developing leaders because it assumes that individuals can change their behaviour to affect there leadership qualities. This model has got a leadership behaviour baseline which sets the standard for future leaders to mold their own behaviour to. The difference between these two theories is that one suggests leadership is effected by our characteristics and the other suggests leadership is influenced by adaptation of behaviour.
Effective leader behaviour falls into two categories, concern for people and concern for production. T
he only way that a leader can be fully successful is by concentrating on both of these factors. The grid is an example of leader in a office environment. If this was put into the sporting world a coach would have to concentrate on players happiness (Social Cohesion) and success (Task Cohesion).
Situation specific behaviour theories of leadership.
The theories in this type of leadership takes into account the idea of leadership is a function of the interaction between a leaders behaviour and the situation.
Path Goal Theory
The path goal leadership theory was originally developed by Robert House, the leader will be responsible for developing pathways for members of the group to achieve specific goals. Depending on the situation this can be very useful, the leader will provide information and supports. For example if a young Swimmer wants to achieve a time to represent Great Britain in the Olympics his coach will have to develop specific training and give information on situations the athlete will face.
Life Cycle Theory
The life cycle theory was developed by Paul Hersey and Kenneth H. Blanchard. According to this theory the leader had to analyse the maturity of his group or player and then decide on a certain leadership style. If a leader is assessing his players maturity it means, the players desire to succeed and his or her desire to take on responsibility. For example if a coach decides the player is responsible then he will give the player advice and let him or her make the changes in their own game, if the player is deemed to have lower maturity the coach will have to give more support than just advice; Specific training goals, and specif training drills to help the player and their needs.
Coach-Athlete Compatibility
The compatibility of a coach and athlete is the relationship between the two, this has been shown to be an important factor for individual and team success. With the coach and athlete being incompatible, their can be a feeling of detachment and isolation for both individuals. A relationship between the two that is compatible will mean good communication and respect between the two, this will ultimately lead to a more satisfied athlete and an improved performance.
Reference Guide
(Jeffrey K. Pinto, 1998, Project Leadership: from Theory to Practise, Project Management Institute).
Dr. Paul L. Gerhardt, PhD (The Organizational Doctor TM)
(V.G. Kondalker, Organizational Behaviour,2007, New Delhi, New Age International Publishers).
